06 December 2007
I've written 17 tips on novel writing. There are many more experienced people offering advice on how to paint a scene or structure a plot, so I've just focused on the logistics. In all the guides to novel writing I've seen, there's relatively little attention paid to organising ideas and time, which are key challenges for most writers.
What you've described as "wasting time", we software developers describe as "prototyping". I think that even though you discard the tangible results, the time is far from wasted.
But it's hard to think of it as prototyping when you realise you've just spent days writing something that's no use.
When you prototype software, you've usually got a pretty good idea of the finished product, and reasonable confidence you have the skills to complete it. You rarely prototype features that are completely redundant in the finished product.
When you're writing your first novel, you might not have a clear idea of the shape of the whole plot and might not have confidence that you have the skills to write a novel (since most people start without any training or prior novel-writing experience). You probably will write chapters that you have to delete outright.
That's when people need to accept that they will waste time, because sometimes it'll feel like they are. If people can't accept that some time is wasted, they'll treasure their time too highly to delete scenes that really should go, too.
I think it's easier for people to accept that they'll waste time (or at least, that it will feel like it), than it is for them to think of everything as a positive step towards the final book. With hindsight, it's possible to see everything as progress. But when you're in the middle of a big project, where you have no experience and are unsure you can even finish it, it takes extraordinary confidence to see failed drafts as prototypes.
Secondly, I am over fifty thousand words in to my story and one of the central characters is a well known celebrety who is still alive. What are the implecations of this? He is so central to the theme that I fear my story will lose a lot of impact if I am not permitted to mention his name.
I would appreciate any advice you can give me on this. Michael O'Shea.
Generally, authors tend to fictionalise the celebrity. In Ben Elton's Past Mortem, there's a character that is a bit like Richard Branson, but who isn't actually Richard Branson. There was a novel written by one of Syd Barrett's former girlfriends which includes a musician character widely believed to be inspired by Syd, but who isn't actually Syd. I'm sure there are other examples too.
It's probably safer not to use a living person for a central character. You might be able to do it, and it might be creatively and artistically valid, but ultimately you're dependent on the celebrity not taking action against you (for whatever reason), and they probably have more resource than you to fight a case, whatever its merits. I'd be wary about having something as substantial as a book depending on someone's goodwill to that extent. One idea might be to get the approval of the celebrity concerned, although that can be very hard to do (not least because they probably don't have time to read the book).
That said, if you're 50,000 words in, I suggest you finish writing it, and then look at how you can fix this (if you decide to) during revisions. You've come a long way, and it's always better to finish something than to leave it hanging. Sounds like you're doing very well for your first attempt at creative writing!
Thank you for your prompt response, your advice is very helpful. The Character in my story is not actually the celebrety but an apparition of him generated by an alien super computer. Furthermore it is not an apparition of him in person but a character he played in an eighties sit-com. Does this make any difference?
Blog Home | Website Home